These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1603937)

  • 1. "Substantial evidence" criteria needed to uphold verdict on appeal. Case in point: Silvis through Silvis v. Hobbs (824 P 2d. 1013--MT (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):4. PubMed ID: 1603937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When nurses must question doctors' orders.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):1. PubMed ID: 3347755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can doctors amend nurses' notes?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Nov; 28(6):1. PubMed ID: 3423260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nursing negligence is not "proximate cause" of injury. Case in point: Beilke by Bilke v. Coryell 524 N.W. 2d 607--ND (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Feb; 35(9):2. PubMed ID: 7701069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legal case briefs for nurses. GA: slip & fall case against hospital: the nurse's role as a percipient witness; MO: malpractice suit against multiple parties: venue based on nurse's residence.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Jul; 37(2):3. PubMed ID: 8850780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are nurses held to same standards of care as physicians? Case in point: Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (6 Cal Rptr. 2d 900-CA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jun; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 1626055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal monitor delay: "proximate cause" issue.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Mar; 31(10):1. PubMed ID: 2024012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Over $2 million dollar award for death from delivery error affirmed. Case on point: Hatwood v. Hospital of Univ of Penn., 2012 PA Super 217 (10/5/2012)-PA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Oct; 53(5):4. PubMed ID: 23156023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Malpractice: ruling on state-agent immunity overturned in Alabama.
    Toprani N
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(1):109-10. PubMed ID: 11521262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.