423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16039489)
1. Conservation of corneal tissue with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lee DH; Oh JR; Reinstein DZ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jun; 31(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 16039489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of postoperative wavefront aberrations after NIDEK CXIII optimized aspheric transition zone treatment and OPD-guided custom aspheric treatment.
Hantera M
J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10 Suppl):S922-6. PubMed ID: 19848371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal higher order aberrations after LASIK for high myopia with a fast repetition rate excimer laser, optimized ablation profile, and femtosecond laser-assisted flap.
Vega-Estrada A; Alió JL; Arba Mosquera S; Moreno LJ
J Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 28(10):689-96. PubMed ID: 23061998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A contralateral, randomized comparison of optimized prolate ablation and conventional LASIK for myopia with the NIDEK excimer laser platform.
El Danasoury AM; Holladay J; Waring GO; Pieger S; Bains HS
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):453-61. PubMed ID: 22767164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LASIK for myopia with Aspheric "aberration neutral" ablations using the ESIRIS laser system.
Arbelaez MC; Vidal C; Jabri BA; Arba Mosquera S
J Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 25(11):991-9. PubMed ID: 19921767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and aspheric ablation profile with iris registration to correct myopia.
Wu J; Zhong X; Yang B; Wang Z; Yu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 23809945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal wavefront-guided enhancement for high levels of corneal coma aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Alió JL; Piñero DP; Plaza Puche AB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 18242444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zone.
Seo KY; Lee JB; Kang JJ; Lee ES; Kim EK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):653-7. PubMed ID: 15050263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers.
Twa MD; Lembach RG; Bullimore MA; Roberts C
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 16023065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Matsumura K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
