301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16039540)
1. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Wolverton DE; Weber BL; Metz CE; Zhong W; Cummings SA
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 12409590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Janardanan J; Sennett CA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2014 Oct; 1(3):031009. PubMed ID: 26158050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography screening and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective study.
Giannakeas V; Lubinski J; Gronwald J; Moller P; Armel S; Lynch HT; Foulkes WD; Kim-Sing C; Singer C; Neuhausen SL; Friedman E; Tung N; Senter L; Sun P; Narod SA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Aug; 147(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 25082516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do women change their breast cancer mammogram screening behaviour after BRCA1/2 testing?
Larouche G; Chiquette J; Pelletier S; Simard J; Dorval M
Fam Cancer; 2017 Jan; 16(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27554086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and in women at high risk for breast cancer: MR imaging and mammographic features.
Gilbert FJ; Warren RM; Kwan-Lim G; Thompson DJ; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Leach MO;
Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):358-68. PubMed ID: 19703879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
