674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16040100)
1. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.
Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Billatos ES; Zorn KC; Gong EM; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1275-9. PubMed ID: 17169649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy.
Ahlering TE; Eichel L; Skarecky D
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 18313123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Finley DS; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 19013596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation.
Ahlering TE; Eichel L; Chou D; Skarecky DW
Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):994-7. PubMed ID: 15882740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.
Miller J; Smith A; Kouba E; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. PubMed ID: 17631338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Srinualnad S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Mar; 91(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 18575292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.
Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 17084520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic assisted laparoscopic sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy: initial experience.
Kaouk JH; Desai MM; Abreu SC; Papay F; Gill IS
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):909-12. PubMed ID: 12913728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy in the phosphodiesterase type 5 ERA: impact of neurovascular bundle preservation.
Haffner MC; Landis PK; Saigal CS; Carter HB; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 16040103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urinary and sexual quality of life 1 year following robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov SA; Eng MK; Bernstein AJ; Katz M; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):663-7. PubMed ID: 18554650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients.
Mikhail AA; Stockton BR; Orvieto MA; Chien GW; Gong EM; Zorn KC; Brendler CB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 16566979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy.
Le CQ; Gettman MT
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2006 Jul; 6(7):1003-11. PubMed ID: 16831073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health-related quality of life evaluation in patients undergoing cavernous nerve reconstruction during radical prostatectomy.
Sugimoto M; Tsunemori H; Kakehi Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 39(10):671-6. PubMed ID: 19654133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
