208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16040325)
1. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs.
Strauss RA; Eucker B; Savitz DA; Thorp JM
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 13(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16040325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Gram-stained smears prepared from blind vaginal swabs with those obtained at speculum examination for the assessment of vaginal flora.
Morgan DJ; Aboud CJ; McCaffrey IM; Bhide SA; Lamont RF; Taylor-Robinson D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Nov; 103(11):1105-8. PubMed ID: 8916997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Diagnostic value of Gram stain for assessment of vaginal smears during pregnancy].
Wasiela M; Krzemiński Z; Hanke W; Kalinka J
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2004; 56(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 15524400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the use of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cytological smears with Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy.
Lamont RF; Hudson EA; Hay PE; Morgan DJ; Modi V; Ison CA; Taylor-Robinson D
Int J STD AIDS; 1999 Feb; 10(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10215113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.
Libman MD; Kramer M; Platt R;
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 54(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 16427240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of self-collected versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Kashyap B; Singh R; Bhalla P; Arora R; Aggarwal A
Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Aug; 19(8):510-3. PubMed ID: 18663034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic tests for bacterial vaginosis.
Davis JD; Connor EE; Clark P; Wilkinson EJ; Duff P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 9322619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relation between Gram-stain and clinical criteria for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis with special reference to Gram grade II evaluation.
Taylor-Robinson D; Morgan DJ; Sheehan M; Rosenstein IJ; Lamont RF
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jan; 14(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12590785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial vaginosis: comparison of Pap smear and microbiological test results.
Tokyol C; Aktepe OC; Cevrioğlu AS; Altindiş M; Dilek FH
Mod Pathol; 2004 Jul; 17(7):857-60. PubMed ID: 15073605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Self-collected vaginal swabs to diagnosis bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy: A pilot study].
Bresson L; Massoni S; Jailloux-Beaurain C; Bissinger MC; Subtil D; Husson MO; Courcol R; Fruchart A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):701-5. PubMed ID: 16919493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Pap smear for detection of bacterial vaginosis.
Karani A; De Vuyst H; Luchters S; Othigo J; Mandaliya K; Chersich MF; Temmerman M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Jul; 98(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 17466304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcome.
Kurki T; Sivonen A; Renkonen OV; Savia E; Ylikorkala O
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 1635726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of sequential self-obtained vaginal smears for detecting changes in the vaginal flora.
Schwebke JR; Morgan SC; Weiss HL
Sex Transm Dis; 1997 Apr; 24(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 9101636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of regular vaginal pH screening on the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.
Gjerdingen D; Fontaine P; Bixby M; Santilli J; Welsh J
J Fam Pract; 2000 Jan; 49(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 10678339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.
Tam MT; Yungbluth M; Myles T
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 9894174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of reliability of self-collected vaginal swabs over physician-collected samples for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis and trichomoniasis, in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study in India.
Khan Z; Bhargava A; Mittal P; Bharti R; Puri P; Khunger N; Bala M
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e025013. PubMed ID: 31462459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Gram stain and Pap smear procedures in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
Vardar E; Maral I; Inal M; Ozgüder O; Tasli F; Postaci H
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 2002; 10(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 12648314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The short-term variability of bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by Nugent Gram stain criteria among sexually active women in Rakai, Uganda.
Thoma ME; Gray RH; Kiwanuka N; Aluma S; Wang MC; Sewankambo N; Wawer MJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Feb; 38(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 20921931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial vaginosis in sexually experienced and non-sexually experienced young women entering the military.
Yen S; Shafer MA; Moncada J; Campbell CJ; Flinn SD; Boyer CB
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):927-33. PubMed ID: 14672465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.
Menard JP; Mazouni C; Fenollar F; Raoult D; Boubli L; Bretelle F
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 20814710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
