These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16040442)

  • 1. Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity.
    Schmidlin PR; Zehnder M; Schlup-Mityko C; Göhring TN
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 16040442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
    Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of temperature on unpolymerized composite resin film thickness.
    Blalock JS; Holmes RG; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 17174660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Kükrer D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 16671990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flow characteristics and film thickness of flowable resin composites.
    Moon PC; Tabassian MS; Culbreath TE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 12022455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G; Hedlund SO
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Dec; 55(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 9477035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials.
    Hahn P; Schaller HG; Müllner U; Hellwig E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 9781859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Dent Mater; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1264-8. PubMed ID: 19539358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts.
    Sadek FT; Monticelli F; Goracci C; Tay FR; Cardoso PE; Ferrari M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 16434092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.