142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16040902)
1. Solid breast masses: classification with computer-aided analysis of continuous US images obtained with probe compression.
Moon WK; Chang RF; Chen CJ; Chen DR; Chen WL
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):458-64. PubMed ID: 16040902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Solid breast masses: neural network analysis of vascular features at three-dimensional power Doppler US for benign or malignant classification.
Chang RF; Huang SF; Moon WK; Lee YH; Chen DR
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17312276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided analysis of ultrasound elasticity images for classification of benign and malignant breast masses.
Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Park SH; Chang JM; Jang M; Kim KG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1460-5. PubMed ID: 21098210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2-D ultrasound strain images for breast cancer diagnosis using nonrigid subregion registration.
Chen CJ; Chang RF; Moon WK; Chen DR; Wu HK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):837-46. PubMed ID: 16785006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction.
Zhu Q; Cronin EB; Currier AA; Vine HS; Huang M; Chen N; Xu C
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 16183924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM; Ramachandran A; Paramagul C; LeCarpentier GL; Nees A; Blane C
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):744-54. PubMed ID: 15124991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis.
Itoh A; Ueno E; Tohno E; Kamma H; Takahashi H; Shiina T; Yamakawa M; Matsumura T
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 16484352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of elastographic and B-mode features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification.
Moon WK; Huang CS; Shen WC; Takada E; Chang RF; Joe J; Nakajima M; Kobayashi M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1794-802. PubMed ID: 19767139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression.
Fleury Ede F; Fleury JC; Piato S; Roveda D
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 15(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 19517379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Kim SM; Park SH; Han BK; Choe YH; Park JM; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17090709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided diagnosis for 3-dimensional breast ultrasonography.
Chen DR; Chang RF; Chen WM; Moon WK
Arch Surg; 2003 Mar; 138(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 12611578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors by 2-d analysis based on contour description and scatterer characterization.
Tsui PH; Liao YY; Chang CC; Kuo WH; Chang KJ; Yeh CK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):513-22. PubMed ID: 20129851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image retrieval with principal component analysis for breast cancer diagnosis on various ultrasonic systems.
Huang YL; Kuo SJ; Chang CS; Liu YK; Moon WK; Chen DR
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 16086435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of machine learning software to classify breast lesions using BI-RADS radiomic features on ultrasound images.
Fleury E; Marcomini K
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Aug; 3(1):34. PubMed ID: 31385114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided US diagnosis of breast lesions by using cell-based contour grouping.
Cheng JZ; Chou YH; Huang CS; Chang YC; Tiu CM; Chen KW; Chen CM
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):746-54. PubMed ID: 20501714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
