These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16040910)
21. Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall--depiction with multi-detector row CT. Tsuboi M; Takase K; Kaneda I; Ishibashi T; Yamada T; Kitami M; Higano S; Takahashi S Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 18096535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT of the normal temporal bone: comparison of multi- and single-detector row CT. Jäger L; Bonell H; Liebl M; Srivastav S; Arbusow V; Hempel M; Reiser M Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 15703310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Foley TA; Earnest F; Nathan MA; Hough DM; Schiller HJ; Hoskin TL Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15749978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility of low-dose unenhanced multi-detector CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: comparison with sonography. Karabulut N; Kiroglu Y; Herek D; Kocak TB; Erdur B Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 24513314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT. Poortman P; Oostvogel HJ; Bosma E; Lohle PN; Cuesta MA; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Hamming JF J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Mar; 208(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 19318006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT--a prospective randomized study. Kaiser S; Frenckner B; Jorulf HK Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):633-8. PubMed ID: 12034928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Winer-Muram HT; Rydberg J; Johnson MS; Tarver RD; Williams MD; Shah H; Namyslowski J; Conces D; Jennings SG; Ying J; Trerotola SO; Kopecky KK Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 15564410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. Lowe LH; Penney MW; Stein SM; Heller RM; Neblett WW; Shyr Y; Hernanz-Schulman M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jan; 176(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11133533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Malone AJ; Wolf CR; Malmed AS; Melliere BF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Apr; 160(4):763-6. PubMed ID: 8456661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. Lane MJ; Katz DS; Ross BA; Clautice-Engle TL; Mindelzun RE; Jeffrey RB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 9016216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Balthazar EJ; Birnbaum BA; Yee J; Megibow AJ; Roshkow J; Gray C Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8259423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic performance of CT findings in differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. Suthikeeree W; Lertdomrongdej L; Charoensak A J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93(12):1422-9. PubMed ID: 21344805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving the false-negative rate of CT in acute appendicitis-Reassessment of CT images by body imaging radiologists: a blinded prospective study. Poortman P; Lohle PN; Schoemaker CM; Cuesta MA; Oostvogel HJ; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Hamming JF Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 19185439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Versus CT for the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis in Children and Young Adults. Kinner S; Pickhardt PJ; Riedesel EL; Gill KG; Robbins JB; Kitchin DR; Ziemlewicz TJ; Harringa JB; Reeder SB; Repplinger MD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):911-919. PubMed ID: 28796552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis. in't Hof KH; van Lankeren W; Krestin GP; Bonjer HJ; Lange JF; Becking WB; Kazemier G Br J Surg; 2004 Dec; 91(12):1641-5. PubMed ID: 15386320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Krishnamoorthi R; Ramarajan N; Wang NE; Newman B; Rubesova E; Mueller CM; Barth RA Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):231-9. PubMed ID: 21324843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography reduce the incremental value of indirect CT venography compared with single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography? Ghaye B; Nchimi A; Noukoua CT; Dondelinger RF Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):256-62. PubMed ID: 16720870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]