These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041157)

  • 1. Assessment of coronary intima--media thickness by optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kume T; Akasaka T; Kawamoto T; Watanabe N; Toyota E; Neishi Y; Sukmawan R; Sadahira Y; Yoshida K
    Circ J; 2005 Aug; 69(8):903-7. PubMed ID: 16041157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques.
    Kawasaki M; Bouma BE; Bressner J; Houser SL; Nadkarni SK; MacNeill BD; Jang IK; Fujiwara H; Tearney GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 48(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 16814652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical coherence tomography for characterization of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in late survivors of pediatric heart transplantation.
    Tomai F; De Luca L; Petrolini A; Di Vito L; Ghini AS; Corvo P; De Persio G; Parisi F; Pongiglione G; Giulia Gagliardi M; Prati F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2016 Jan; 35(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 26452998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy can be distinguished from donor-transmitted coronary atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography imaging in a heart transplantation recipient: double layered intimal thickness.
    Imamura T; Kinugawa K; Murasawa T; Kagami Y; Endo M; Muraoka H; Fujino T; Inaba T; Maki H; Hatano M; Kinoshita O; Nawata K; Kyo S; Komuro I; Ono M
    Int Heart J; 2014; 55(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 24632967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of coronary lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaque progression and regression.
    Xie Z; Tian J; Ma L; Du H; Dong N; Hou J; He J; Dai J; Liu X; Pan H; Liu Y; Yu B
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 16(12):1374-80. PubMed ID: 25911116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carotid intima-media thickness by B-mode ultrasound as surrogate of coronary atherosclerosis: correlation with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary intravascular ultrasound findings.
    Amato M; Montorsi P; Ravani A; Oldani E; Galli S; Ravagnani PM; Tremoli E; Baldassarre D
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Sep; 28(17):2094-101. PubMed ID: 17597051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation.
    Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography.
    Kume T; Okura H; Kawamoto T; Yamada R; Miyamoto Y; Hayashida A; Watanabe N; Neishi Y; Sadahira Y; Akasaka T; Yoshida K
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Jan; 6(6):768-72. PubMed ID: 21205603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visualization of neointima formation by optical coherence tomography.
    Kume T; Akasaka T; Kawamoto T; Watanabe N; Toyota E; Sukmawan R; Sadahira Y; Yoshida K
    Int Heart J; 2005 Nov; 46(6):1133-6. PubMed ID: 16394609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy with and without intimal neovascularization.
    Ichibori Y; Ohtani T; Nakatani D; Tachibana K; Yamaguchi O; Toda K; Akasaka T; Fukushima N; Sawa Y; Komuro I; Kotani J; Sakata Y
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25976347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
    Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
    Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Jang IK; Bouma BE; Kang DH; Park SJ; Park SW; Seung KB; Choi KB; Shishkov M; Schlendorf K; Pomerantsev E; Houser SL; Aretz HT; Tearney GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Feb; 39(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 11849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
    Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation of irregularities in carotid arterial intima-media thickness with coronary artery disease.
    Ishizu T; Ishimitsu T; Kamiya H; Seo Y; Moriyama N; Obara K; Watanabe S; Yamaguchi I
    Heart Vessels; 2002 Nov; 17(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12434195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrelationship between noninvasive predictors of atherosclerosis: transthoracic coronary flow reserve, flow-mediated dilation, carotid intima-media thickness, aortic stiffness, aortic distensibility, elastic modulus, and brachial artery diameter.
    Gullu H; Erdogan D; Caliskan M; Tok D; Yildirim E; Ulus T; Turan Sezgin A; Muderrisoglu H
    Echocardiography; 2006 Nov; 23(10):835-42. PubMed ID: 17069601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.