125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041677)
1. Third-trimester ultrasound dating algorithms derived from pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mongelli M; Chew S; Yuxin NG; Biswas A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 16041677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.
Papageorghiou AT; Kemp B; Stones W; Ohuma EO; Kennedy SH; Purwar M; Salomon LJ; Altman DG; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Pang R; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Jaffer YA; Victora CG; Bhutta ZA; Villar J;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):719-726. PubMed ID: 26924421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second-trimester assessment of gestational age in twins: validation of singleton biometry charts.
Dias T; Arcangeli T; Bhide A; Mahsud-Dornan S; Papageorghiou A; Thilaganathan B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 20617507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan.
Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Reilly M; Valentin L; Grunewald C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.
Drukker L; Droste R; Chatelain P; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31763735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization.
Mongelli M; Yuxin NG; Biswas A; Chew S
Acta Radiol; 2003 Jul; 44(4):452-5. PubMed ID: 12846699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age.
Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?
Chervenak FA; Skupski DW; Romero R; Myers MK; Smith-Levitin M; Rosenwaks Z; Thaler HT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 178(4):678-87. PubMed ID: 9579429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
Wessel H; Nyberg T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasonographic measurement of the transcerebellar diameter for gestational age estimation in the third trimester.
Bavini S; Mittal R; Mendiratta SL
J Ultrasound; 2022 Jun; 25(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 33687690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
