These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041789)

  • 1. Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system.
    Kitagawa T; Tanimoto Y; Odaki M; Nemoto K; Aida M
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Nov; 75(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 16041789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS; Benetti P; Carli JP; Paranhos LR; Santos PL; Linden MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
    Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs.
    Tang CB; Liul SY; Zhou GX; Yu JH; Zhang GD; Bao YD; Wang QJ
    Int J Oral Sci; 2012 Jun; 4(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 22699263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two implant/abutment joint designs: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Khraisat A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e83-7. PubMed ID: 23527372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of a Positioning Hex on Abutment Rotation in Tapered Internal Implants: A 3D Finite Element Model Study.
    Hyun DG; Kwon HB; Lim YJ; Koak JY; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):281-288. PubMed ID: 32142564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of new designs in implant-abutment connections: a finite element method assessment.
    Covani U; Ricci M; Tonelli P; Barone A
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23619750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the effect of abutment-implant connection type on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system using finite element methods.
    Pournasrollah A; Negahdari R; Gharekhani V; Torab A; Jannati Ataei S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2019; 13(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 32190213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.
    Piermatti J; Yousef H; Luke A; Mahevich R; Weiner S
    Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 17172962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative analysis of different types of implant-abutment interface on the basis of three-dimensional finite element analysis data].
    Muraev AA; Ivanov SY; Leonov SV; Mrue AH; Muhametshin RF; Gazhva YV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 30830086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
    Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.