155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041853)
1. Supreme Court. State laws will not protect medical marijuana users.
AIDS Policy Law; 2005 Jul; 20(13):3. PubMed ID: 16041853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court rejects attack on medical marijuana.
Wolski K
N J Nurse; 2003 Dec; 33(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 14746112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical marijuana. High court to determine constitutionality of marijuana ban.
AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Jul; 19(13):8. PubMed ID: 15300940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justices mull medical marijuana laws.
AIDS Policy Law; 2003 Oct; 18(20):1. PubMed ID: 14626967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical marijuana and the Supreme Court.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Aug; 353(7):648-51. PubMed ID: 16107619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. High court hears arguments in medical marijuana case.
AIDS Policy Law; 2004 Dec; 19(22):7. PubMed ID: 15628008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Justices say doctors may not be punished for recommending medical marijuana.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 14610768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court says no to medical marijuana.
Hopkins Tanne J
BMJ; 2005 Jun; 330(7505):1408. PubMed ID: 15961803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates.
Krisberg K
Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Justices set back use of marijuana to treat illness.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2001 May; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 12159858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Brewing a pot of hysteria.
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 8(8):971. PubMed ID: 16047019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Good cop, bad cop: federal prosecution of state-legalized medical marijuana use after United States v. Lopez.
Newbern AE
Calif Law Rev; 2000 Oct; 88(5):1575-634. PubMed ID: 11475489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
Lorber L
Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal status of medical marijuana.
Seamon MJ
Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Dec; 40(12):2211-5. PubMed ID: 17062830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical marijuana: important vote coming, you can help.
James JS
AIDS Treat News; 2004 Jun; (402):7. PubMed ID: 15272460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
Laughlin C
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 16083100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gonzales v. Raich. In the Supreme Court of the United States.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2005; 21(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 16173504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical marijuana: largest provider closed, some alternatives available.
James JS
AIDS Treat News; 1998 Jun; (No 296):1, 7. PubMed ID: 11365467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court denies leave to appeal in medical marijuana charter challenge.
Elliott R; Carey R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Dec; 7(2-3):72. PubMed ID: 14743810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gonzales v. Raich: federalism as a casualty of the war on drugs.
Somin I
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2006; 15(3):507-50. PubMed ID: 17593582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
