These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041881)
1. The right to found a family. Douglas G; Hebenton B; Thomas T New Law J; 1992 Apr; 142(6548):537-8. PubMed ID: 16041881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The regulation of assisted reproductive technology: a comparative study of permissive and prescriptive laws and policies. Petersen K J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):483-97. PubMed ID: 12194479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Constitution. Coleman CH Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 15868662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consultation on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. Bull Med Ethics; 2005; (210):10-3. PubMed ID: 16471005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexism, sex selection and 'family balancing'. Wilkinson S Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):369-89. PubMed ID: 18628347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical assisted reproduction and its use in favor of homosexual couples: a legal view. Sales AA Med Law; 2012 Jun; 31(2):295-324. PubMed ID: 22900415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Hagger L Med Law Int; 1997; 3(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 16124132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to found a family. Douglas G; Hebenton B; Thomas T New Law J; 1992 Apr; 142(6547):488-90. PubMed ID: 11659583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Should older and postmenopausal women have access to assisted reproductive technology? Goold I Monash Bioeth Rev; 2005 Jan; 24(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 16007754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Britain's HFEA is caught in the middle. Campbell AV Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):8. PubMed ID: 16092389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary issues in the regulation of artificial reproduction and embryology in the UK. Garwood-Gowers A Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2004; (21):67-101. PubMed ID: 15832803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and assessment for parenthood: in whose best interests? Ryburn M; Fleming A Early Child Dev Care; 1993; 91():65-75. PubMed ID: 11660791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Twins test limits of British law. MacLeod A Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Jan; 92(36):6. PubMed ID: 15586923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryo research and fertilisation code. Walker A BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to reproduce. Chadwick RF Mod Churchm; 1987; 29(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 16127859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted conception and clinical practice: whose freedom is it? Morgan D New Law J; 1990 Apr; 140(6453):600, 603. PubMed ID: 16041877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clones, ethics and infertility or sex, sheep and statutes. Deech RL Quinnipiac Health Law J; 1999; 2(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 15712425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted conception and the law in the United Kingdom. Braude P; Muhammed S BMJ; 2003 Oct; 327(7421):978-81. PubMed ID: 14576252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 upon the practice of assisted reproduction techniques in the United Kingdom. Brinsden PR J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Nov; 10(8):493-9. PubMed ID: 8081085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]