These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16041993)

  • 1. Impedance characterization and modeling of electrodes for biomedical applications.
    Franks W; Schenker I; Schmutz P; Hierlemann A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1295-302. PubMed ID: 16041993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of electrode array for impedance measurement of lesions in arteries.
    Cho S; Thielecke H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S19-26. PubMed ID: 15798232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
    Duan YY; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
    Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
    Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of esophagus status and catheter configuration on multiple intraluminal impedance measurements.
    Al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 15798298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two- and four-electrode techniques to characterize blood impedance for the frequency range of 100 Hz to 100 MHz.
    Chang ZY; Pop GM; Meijer GM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1247-9. PubMed ID: 18334424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of sputtered iridium oxide and platinum-coated neural implantable microelectrode arrays.
    Negi S; Bhandari R; Rieth L; Solzbacher F
    Biomed Mater; 2010 Feb; 5(1):15007. PubMed ID: 20124668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Note: Characterization of electrode materials for dielectric spectroscopy.
    Malleo D; Nevill JT; van Ooyen A; Schnakenberg U; Lee LP; Morgan H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2010 Jan; 81(1):016104. PubMed ID: 20113135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
    Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design rule for optimization of microelectrodes used in electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS).
    Price DT; Rahman AR; Bhansali S
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Mar; 24(7):2071-6. PubMed ID: 19101134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combinatorial materials research applied to the development of new surface coatings X: a high-throughput electrochemical impedance spectroscopy method for screening organic coatings for corrosion inhibition.
    He J; Bahr J; Chisholm BJ; Li J; Chen Z; Balbyshev SN; Bonitz V; Bierwagen GP
    J Comb Chem; 2008; 10(5):704-13. PubMed ID: 18582116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrical properties of retinal-electrode interface.
    Shah S; Hines A; Zhou D; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S24-9. PubMed ID: 17325413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode-tissues interface: modeling and experimental validation.
    Sawan M; Laaziri Y; Mounaim F; Elzayat E; Corcos J; Elhilali MM
    Biomed Mater; 2007 Mar; 2(1):S7-S15. PubMed ID: 18458423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three kinds of electrode-skin interfaces for electrical impedance scanning.
    Yin Y; Ji Z; Zhang W; Wang N; Fu F; Liu R; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2032-9. PubMed ID: 20437203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body composition modeling in the calf using an equivalent circuit model of multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis.
    Zhu F; Leonard EF; Levin NW
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S133-43. PubMed ID: 15798226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simple mathematical model for electric cell-substrate impedance sensing with extended applications.
    Xiao C; Luong JH
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Mar; 25(7):1774-80. PubMed ID: 20096558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harmonic analysis of low-frequency bioelectrode behavior.
    Richardot A; McAdams ET
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 12166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encapsulation of an integrated neural interface device with Parylene C.
    Hsu JM; Rieth L; Normann RA; Tathireddy P; Solzbacher F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19224715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.