These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16042003)

  • 1. Speaker normalization for chinese vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1358-61. PubMed ID: 16042003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonuniform speaker normalization using affine transformation.
    Bharath Kumar SV; Umesh S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1727-38. PubMed ID: 19045663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T; Xu T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuous improvement in Mandarin lexical tone perception as the number of channels increased: a simulation study of cochlear implant.
    Lin YS; Lee FP; Huang IS; Peng SC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 May; 127(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 17453477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On normalized MSE analysis of speech fundamental frequency in the cochlear implant-like spectrally reduced speech.
    Do CT; Pastor D; Goalic A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 19744908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
    Ames H; Grossberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Speech coding strategy based on amplitude and frequency modulation for cochlear implants].
    Lin H; Wang W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 28(2):228-32. PubMed ID: 21604474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.