These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16042026)

  • 1. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia?
    Kuhn C; Rosenthal A; Bublak P; Grotemeyer KH; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ineffective leftward search in line bisection and mechanisms of left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Gono S
    J Neurol; 1996 May; 243(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 8741077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Freeman P; Tahmahkera-Stevens C; Chaussee M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Feb; 45(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11161362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lost in the middle. Attentional modulation of the pseudoneglect phenomenon in a "no hands" line bisection paradigm.
    Lavanchy L; Mayer E; Hauert CA
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):181-2. PubMed ID: 15174463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralesional spatial bias in chronic hemianopia: the role of (ec)centric fixation, spatial cueing and visual search.
    Kuhn C; Bublak P; Jobst U; Rosenthal A; Reinhart S; Kerkhoff G
    Neuroscience; 2012 May; 210():118-27. PubMed ID: 22465437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections.
    Nicholls ME; McIlroy AM
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 20178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of paradoxical leftward error of line bisection in left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Seki K
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Mar; 45(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11237369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME; Shpaner M; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM; Roth HL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does phasic alerting improve performance in patients with unilateral neglect? A systematic analysis of attentional processing capacity and spatial weighting mechanisms.
    Finke K; Matthias E; Keller I; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1178-89. PubMed ID: 22386879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.