These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16042026)

  • 21. Effects of cueing on visuospatial processing in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Okiyama R
    J Neurol; 1995 Jun; 242(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 7561964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image of a line is not shrunk but neglected. Absence of crossover in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Nakano N; Seki K; Nishida Y; Hayashi K
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 14644110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 10683402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
    Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Mind the gap": the size-distance dissociation in visual neglect is a cueing effect.
    McIntosh RD; McClements KI; Dijkerman HC; Milner AD
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 15156792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?
    Nicholls ME; Roberts GR
    Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL; Bradshaw JA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Oct; 57(10):1228-35. PubMed ID: 7931385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect.
    Ishiai S; Furukawa T; Tsukagoshi H
    Brain; 1989 Dec; 112 ( Pt 6)():1485-502. PubMed ID: 2597992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.
    Sosa Y; Clarke AM; McCourt ME
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1207-15. PubMed ID: 21447353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.
    Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.