212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16042723)
1. Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score.
Coogan CL; Latchamsetty KC; Greenfield J; Corman JM; Lynch B; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2005 Aug; 96(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 16042723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score.
Elabbady AA; Khedr MM
Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):49-53; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 16314035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by additional sampling from the anterior lateral horns of the peripheral zone in combination with the standard sextant biopsy.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 15157210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostatectomy and biopsies that show more than two different Gleason scores in positive cores.
Park HK; Choe G; Byun SS; Lee HW; Lee SE; Lee E
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16413344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of the number of core biopsies of the prostate on predicting Gleason score of prostate cancer.
Thickman D; Speers WC; Philpott PJ; Shapiro H
J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 8648769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
Fine SW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer based on systematic core biopsies.
Tarján M; Tot T
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 17130097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
