These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16042723)
21. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade. Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists]. Kato T; Nakano M; Uno H; Seike K; Kojima K; Kubota Y; Goto T; Yamamoto N; Ehara H; Kanimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Deguchi T Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 19048927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Six additional systematic lateral cores enhance sextant biopsy prediction of pathological features at radical prostatectomy. Singh H; Canto EI; Shariat SF; Kadmon D; Miles BJ; Wheeler TM; Slawin KM J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):204-9. PubMed ID: 14665877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relationship between biopsy Gleason score and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score in patients undergoing sextant vs 12 core biopsies. Arrabal-Polo MA; Jiménez-Pacheco A; Mijan-Ortiz JL; Arrabal-Martín M; Valle-Díaz de la Guardia F; López-Carmona Pintado F; López-León VM; Merino-Salas S; Tinaut-Ranera J; Zuluaga-Gómez A Arch Esp Urol; 2010 Nov; 63(9):791-6. PubMed ID: 21098898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting tumour location in radical prostatectomy specimens: same-patient comparisons of 21-sample versus sextant biopsy. De Laet K; de la Taille A; Ploussard G; Hoznek A; Vordos D; Yiou R; Allory Y; Azoulay S; Abbou C; Salomon L BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):616-20. PubMed ID: 19466953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can pT0 stage of prostate cancer be predicted before radical prostatectomy? Descazeaud A; Zerbib M; Flam T; Vieillefond A; Debré B; Peyromaure M Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1248-52; discussion 1253. PubMed ID: 16828964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Correlation between Gleason score of prostatic biopsies and the one of the radical prostatectomy specimen]. Prost J; Gros N; Bastide C; Bladou F; Serment G; Rossi D Prog Urol; 2001 Feb; 11(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11296645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy. Epstein JI; Sanderson H; Carter HB; Scharfstein DO Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 16040085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores. Mian BM; Lehr DJ; Moore CK; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Ross JS; Jennings TA; Nazeer T Urology; 2006 Feb; 67(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 16461089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate needle biopsy examination by means of virtual microscopy. Chargari C; Comperat E; Magné N; Védrine L; Houlgatte A; Egevad L; Camparo P Pathol Res Pract; 2011 Jun; 207(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 21570778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of the percentage of positive biopsy cores on the further stratification of primary grade 3 and grade 4 Gleason score 7 tumors in radical prostatectomy patients. Vira MA; Tomaszewski JE; Hwang WT; D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Vanarsdalen K; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1015-9. PubMed ID: 16286115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Discrepancies in Gleason scoring of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and the effects of multiple needle biopsies on scoring accuracy. A regional experience in Tamworth, Australia. Ooi K; Samali R ANZ J Surg; 2007 May; 77(5):336-8. PubMed ID: 17497970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity. Mariappan P; Chong WL; Sundram M; Mohamed SR BJU Int; 2004 Aug; 94(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 15291857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens. Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Obtaining fresh prostate cancer tissue for research: a novel biopsy needle and sampling technique for radical prostatectomy specimens. Walton TJ; McCulloch TA; Rees RC; Bishop MC Prostate; 2005 Sep; 64(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 15754345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting unilateral prostate cancer on routine diagnostic biopsy: sextant vs extended. Tsivian M; Kimura M; Sun L; Mouraviev V; Mayes JM; Polascik TJ BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(8):1089-92. PubMed ID: 19818078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]