245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16043088)
1. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record.
Hier DB; Rothschild A; LeMaistre A; Keeler J
Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):657-62. PubMed ID: 16043088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation.
Hier DB; Rothschild A; LeMaistre A; Keeler J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15361024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation.
Bloom MV; Huntington MK
Fam Med; 2010 Sep; 42(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 20830621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contributions of surgical residents to patient satisfaction: impact of residents beyond clinical care.
Resnick AS; Disbot M; Wurster A; Mullen JL; Kaiser LR; Morris JB
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18571141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
Abdolrasulnia M; Menachemi N; Shewchuk RM; Ginter PM; Duncan WJ; Brooks RG
Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18580304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
Menachemi N; Matthews MC; Ford EW; Brooks RG
Health Care Manage Rev; 2007; 32(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 17438394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.
Simon SR; Kaushal R; Cleary PD; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Orav EJ; Burdick E; Poon EG; Bates DW
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17353500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-based patient records and changing physicians' practice patterns.
Anderson JG
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Aug; 15(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 10135719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aspects of the Patient-centered Medical Home currently in place: initial findings from preparing the personal physician for practice.
Carney PA; Eiff MP; Saultz JW; Douglass AB; Tillotson CJ; Crane SD; Jones SM; Green LA
Fam Med; 2009 Oct; 41(9):632-9. PubMed ID: 19816826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow.
Lium JT; Faxvaag A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():1031-6. PubMed ID: 17108645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study.
Pizziferri L; Kittler AF; Volk LA; Honour MM; Gupta S; Wang S; Wang T; Lippincott M; Li Q; Bates DW
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Jun; 38(3):176-88. PubMed ID: 15896691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized patient records aren't much good if doctors don't use them. Here's how one hospital got its physicians online.
Strateg Healthc Excell; 1998 Jul; 11(7):7-10. PubMed ID: 10185070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Housestaff and attending physician knowledge of and attitude towards an EMR on the eve of implementation.
Thomas D; Kushniruk A; Kannry J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1133. PubMed ID: 18694230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The electronic health record in Austria: physicians' acceptance is influenced by negative emotions.
Hackl W; Hoerbst A; Ammenwerth E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():140-4. PubMed ID: 19745284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician acceptance of a computerized health maintenance prompting program.
Knight BP; O'Malley MS; Fletcher SW
Am J Prev Med; 1987; 3(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 3452334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of house officers who use physician order entry.
Ash JS; Gorman PN; Hersh WR; Lavelle M; Poulsen SB
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():471-5. PubMed ID: 10566403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens.
Hoerbst A; Kohl CD; Knaup P; Ammenwerth E
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Feb; 79(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 20031482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing barriers to physician data entry for computer-based patient records.
Kaplan B
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Aug; 15(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 10135720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The fate of clinical department systems at the dawn of hospital-wide electronic health records in a Norwegian university hospital.
Vedvik E; Faxvaag A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():298-303. PubMed ID: 17108540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
