BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16043208)

  • 1. The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders.
    Johnson JS; Olshausen BA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3262-76. PubMed ID: 16043208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurophysiological indices of perceptual object priming in the absence of explicit recognition memory.
    Harris JD; Cutmore TR; O'Gorman J; Finnigan S; Shum D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Feb; 71(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 18824201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time course of amodal completion in face perception.
    Chen J; Liu B; Chen B; Fang F
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):752-8. PubMed ID: 19233227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis of perceptual hypothesis generation and testing.
    Weidner R; Shah NJ; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 16494685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: an integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of "closure" processes.
    Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):605-18. PubMed ID: 16168676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sightless view: neural correlates of occluded objects.
    Hulme OJ; Zeki S
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 May; 17(5):1197-205. PubMed ID: 16844722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
    Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r).
    Martín-Loeches M; Sommer W; Hinojosa JA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 15598521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age of acquisition affects object recognition: evidence from visual duration thresholds.
    Dent K; Catling JC; Johnston RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 17055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The "mosaic stage" in amodal completion as characterized by magnetoencephalography responses.
    Plomp G; Liu L; van Leeuwen C; Ioannides AA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1394-405. PubMed ID: 16859423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 19(6):921-34. PubMed ID: 17536963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes.
    Delorme A; Rousselet GA; Macé MJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15019707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth of conceptual knowledge modulates visual processes during word reading.
    Rabovsky M; Sommer W; Abdel Rahman R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 21861677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context - an electrophysiological study.
    Ecker UK; Zimmer HD; Groh-Bordin C; Mecklinger A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 May; 64(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17331603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by event-related potentials.
    Leek EC; Atherton CJ; Thierry G
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 17267003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study.
    Rosazza C; Cai Q; Minati L; Paulignan Y; Nazir TA
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1272():32-44. PubMed ID: 19332032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual masking of oriented lines: interactions between surface segmentation cues.
    van der Smagt MJ; Wehrhahn C; Albright TD
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):576-89. PubMed ID: 15744014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Luminosity--a perceptual "feature" of light-emitting objects?
    Correani A; Scott-Samuel NE; Leonards U
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3915-25. PubMed ID: 16765405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.