BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16043216)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
    Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Mayo MS; Markello SJ; Ahluwalia JS
    Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15313088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.
    Slater JS; Henly GA; Ha CN; Malone ME; Nyman JA; Diaz S; McGovern PG
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Oct; 14(10):2346-52. PubMed ID: 16214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.
    Mohler PJ
    Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7737444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior.
    Partin MR; Casey-Paal AL; Slater JS; Korn JE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(8):681-7. PubMed ID: 9718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What predicts a Cypriot woman's decision to obtain or not obtain a screening mammogram? Implications for the promotion of screening mammography in Cyprus.
    Tolma EL; Reininger BM; Ureda J
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16523012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
    Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of survey nonresponse bias on conclusions drawn from a mammography intervention trial.
    Partin MR; Malone M; Winnett M; Slater J; Bar-Cohen A; Caplan L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 56(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 14505772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
    Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer screening compliance among young women in a free access healthcare system.
    Amin A; Shriver CD; Henry LR; Lenington S; Peoples GE; Stojadinovic A
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 97(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 17918226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening mammography participation and invitational strategy: the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1998-2000.
    Jean S; Major D; Rochette L; Brisson J
    Chronic Dis Can; 2005; 26(2-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 16251010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facility-based inreach strategies to promote annual mammograms.
    Mayer JA; Clapp EJ; Bartholomew S; offer J
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 7880555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.
    Lin PH; Appel LJ; Funk K; Craddick S; Chen C; Elmer P; McBurnie MA; Champagne C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Sep; 107(9):1541-51. PubMed ID: 17761231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mammography screening employee inreach program.
    Robinson J; Seltzer V; Lawrence L; Autz G; Kostroff K; Weiselberg L; Colagiacomo M
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Feb; 52(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 17393764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.