221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16043478)
1. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement.
Ireland AJ; Hosein I; Sherriff M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16043478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer.
Hosein I; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 15592221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-component self-etching primer: a seventh generation of orthodontic bonding system?
Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 20164128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Xeno III self-etching adhesive in orthodontic bonding: the next generation.
Amra I; Samsodien G; Shaikh A; Lalloo R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):160.e11-5. PubMed ID: 17276853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
Valletta R; Prisco D; De Santis R; Ambrosio L; Martina R
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets.
Mui B; Rossouw PE; Kulkarni GV
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 10371435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bond strengths and adhesive remnant index of self-etching adhesives used to bond brackets to instrumented and uninstrumented enamel.
Ritter DE; Ritter AV; Bruggeman G; Locks A; Tulloch JF
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16555658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of enamel discoloration associated with bonding with three different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with four different procedures.
Ye C; Zhao Z; Zhao Q; Du X; Ye J; Wei X
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e35-40. PubMed ID: 23907086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation into the bonding of orthodontic attachments to porcelain.
Larmour CJ; Bateman G; Stirrups DR
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 16199411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.
Duarte S; Botta AC; Meire M; Sadan A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18762032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets.
Eminkahyagil N; Arman A; Cetinşahin A; Karabulut E
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 16539561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 18795520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
