These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1604382)

  • 1. Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia.
    Santow G; Bracher M
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 Apr; 34(8):929-42. PubMed ID: 1604382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of hysterectomy and tubal ligation in public hospitals in south Australia, 1980-82.
    Yusuf F; Briggs DK
    J Biosoc Sci; 1988 Oct; 20(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 3192557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term risk of hysterectomy among 80,007 sterilized and comparison women at Kaiser Permanente, 1971-1987.
    Goldhaber MK; Armstrong MA; Golditch IM; Sheehe PR; Petitti DB; Friedman GD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 138(7):508-21. PubMed ID: 8213755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.
    Dharmalingam A; Pool I; Dickson J
    Am J Public Health; 2000 Sep; 90(9):1455-8. PubMed ID: 10983207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Higher hysterectomy risk for sterilized than nonsterilized women: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
    Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Tylor LR; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 9469283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence, sociodemographic determinants and self-reported reasons for hysterectomy in India.
    Shekhar C; Paswan B; Singh A
    Reprod Health; 2019 Aug; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 31375139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidemiology of hysterectomy in the United States: demographic and reproductive factors in a nationally representative sample.
    Brett KM; Marsh JV; Madans JH
    J Womens Health; 1997 Jun; 6(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 9201665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965-95.
    Chandra A
    Vital Health Stat 23; 1998 Jun; (20):1-33. PubMed ID: 9658983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.
    Huggins GR; Sondheimer SJ
    Fertil Steril; 1984 Mar; 41(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 6230257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Education and hysterectomy.
    Santow G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Feb; 35(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 7772004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubal sterilization and long-term risk of hysterectomy: findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilization. The U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
    Hillis SD; Marchbanks PA; Tylor LR; Peterson HB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 9083322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and D&C: evidence from the Melbourne Women's Midlife Health Project.
    Taffe J; Green A; Dudley E; Dennerstein L
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 10965196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cumulative prevalence rates and corrected incidence rates of surgical sterilization among women in the United States, 1971--1978.
    Nolan TF; Ory HW; Layde PM; Hughes JM; Greenspan JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):776-81. PubMed ID: 7148803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.
    Peterson HB; Xia Z; Hughes JM; Wilcox LS; Tylor LR; Trussell J
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Mar; 336(11):762-7. PubMed ID: 9052654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tubal sterilization: findings in a large prospective study.
    Vessey M; Huggins G; Lawless M; McPherson K; Yeates D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Mar; 90(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 6830727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of tubal ligation in Puebla, Mexico.
    Rudzik AE; Leonard SH; Sievert LL
    Women Health; 2011 Jun; 51(4):365-82. PubMed ID: 21707339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Premature discontinuation of contraception in Australia.
    Bracher M; Santow G
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 1612144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India.
    Desai S; Campbell OM; Sinha T; Mahal A; Cousens S
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Feb; 32(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27497139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tubal sterilization and the long-term risk of hysterectomy.
    Stergachis A; Shy KK; Grothaus LC; Wagner EH; Hecht JA; Anderson G; Normand EH; Raboud J
    JAMA; 1990 Dec; 264(22):2893-8. PubMed ID: 2232083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's income profile as a key indicator of women's status for the understanding of changing fertility behaviour in rural Kenya.
    Safilios-rothschild C
    Genus; 1990; 46(3-4):31-43. PubMed ID: 12343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.