BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16044096)

  • 1. Cyclosporine monitoring with 2-hour postdose levels in heart transplant recipients.
    Solari SG; Goldberg LR; DeNofrio D; Shaw LM
    Ther Drug Monit; 2005 Aug; 27(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 16044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
    Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best single time points to predict the area-under-the-curve in long-term heart transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
    Mardigyan V; Giannetti N; Cecere R; Besner JG; Cantarovich M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1614-8. PubMed ID: 16210138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of trough, 2-hour, and limited AUC blood sampling for monitoring cyclosporin (Neoral) at day 7 post-renal transplantation and incidence of rejection in the first month.
    Morris RG; Russ GR; Cervelli MJ; Juneja R; McDonald SP; Mathew TH
    Ther Drug Monit; 2002 Aug; 24(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 12142630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorption profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) during the first 2 weeks after renal transplantation.
    Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Transplantation; 2001 Sep; 72(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 11579295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of C0 and C2 cyclosporine monitoring in long-term renal transplant recipients.
    Marcén R; Pascual J; Tato A; Villafruela JJ; Teruel JL; Rivera ME; Tenorio M; Fernández M; Burgos FJ; Ortuño J
    Transplant Proc; 2003 Aug; 35(5):1780-2. PubMed ID: 12962793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of cyclosporine 2-h level and mycophenolate mofetil dose on clinical outcomes in de novo heart transplant patients receiving anti-thymocyte globulin induction.
    Cantarovich M; Giannetti N; Cecere R
    Clin Transplant; 2003 Apr; 17(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 12709082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of C2 monitoring to avoid acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
    Schubert S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Lehmkuhl HB; Hübler M; Abd El Rahman MY; Miera O; Ewert P; Weng Y; Wei H; Krüdewagen B; Hetzer R; Berger F
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Jun; 25(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 16730566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation.
    Mahalati K; Belitsky P; Sketris I; West K; Panek R
    Transplantation; 1999 Jul; 68(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10428267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters to facilitate conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in heart transplant recipients.
    Davies RA; Veinot JP; Williams K; Haddad H; Baker A; Donaldson J; Pugliese C; Struthers C; Masters RG; Hendry PJ; Mesana T
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3334-9. PubMed ID: 18089382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized, international study of cyclosporine microemulsion absorption profiling in renal transplantation with basiliximab immunoprophylaxis.
    Internation Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group
    Am J Transplant; 2002 Feb; 2(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 12099518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cyclosporine C2 monitoring is superior to C0 in predicting acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients in Taiwan.
    Chou NK; Chen RJ; Ko WJ; Lin HL; Yu SY; Chen YS; Hsu RB; Lee CM; Lin FY; Wang SS
    Transplant Proc; 2004 Oct; 36(8):2393-5. PubMed ID: 15561260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and clinical outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients.
    Akhlaghi F; Gonzalez L; Trull AK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 16364860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
    Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
    Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of cyclosporine therapeutic monitoring with C2 concentrations in stable renal allograft recipients.
    Díaz JM; Sainz Z; Guirado LL; Montañés R; Picazo M; García-Camín R; Alcaraz A; Solà R
    Transplant Proc; 2003 Aug; 35(5):1783-4. PubMed ID: 12962794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Best single time points as surrogates to the tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid area under the curve in adult liver transplant patients beyond 12 months of transplantation.
    Mardigyan V; Tchervenkov J; Metrakos P; Barkun J; Deschenes M; Cantarovich M
    Clin Ther; 2005 Apr; 27(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 15922819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine.
    Lobritto SJ; Rosenthal P; Bouw R; Leung M; Snell P; Mamelok RD
    Liver Transpl; 2007 Nov; 13(11):1570-5. PubMed ID: 17969194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cyclosporin A absorption profiles in pediatric renal transplant recipients predict the risk of acute rejection.
    Weber LT; Armstrong VW; Shipkova M; Feneberg R; Wiesel M; Mehls O; Zimmerhackl LB; Oellerich M; Tönshoff B;
    Ther Drug Monit; 2004 Aug; 26(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 15257072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo renal transplant recipients: retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.
    Bîrsan T; Loinig C; Bodingbauer M; Wekerle T; Rockenschaub S; Berlakovich G; Soliman T; Mühlbacher F; Steininger R
    Transplantation; 2004 Dec; 78(12):1787-91. PubMed ID: 15614152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of microemulsion cyclosporine A in renal transplantation.
    Bunnag S; Vareesangthip K; Ong-ajyooth L
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89 Suppl 2():S228-34. PubMed ID: 17044476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.