These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16044554)

  • 1. Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate statistical analyses.
    Wolock DM; Winter TC; McMahon G
    Environ Manage; 2004; 34 Suppl 1():S71-88. PubMed ID: 16044554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Misapplication of the Hydrologic Unit Framework Diminishes the Meaning of Watersheds.
    Omernik JM; Griffith GE; Hughes RM; Glover JB; Weber MH
    Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 60(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28378091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hydrologic network supporting spatially referenced regression modeling in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
    Brakebill JW; Preston SD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003; 81(1-3):73-84. PubMed ID: 12620006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The geospatial relationship of geologic strata, geological fractures, and land use attained by a time-series aridity index in a semiarid region.
    Rodríguez-Moreno VM; Kretzschmar TG; Padilla-Ramírez JS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jul; 187(7):457. PubMed ID: 26095900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human-impacted water resources: domain stratification and mapping to determine hydrologically similar units.
    Hutchinson KJ; Haynes DA; Schnoor JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(20):7890-6. PubMed ID: 20873732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative soil descriptions for ecoregions of the United States.
    Shirazi MA; Burch Johnson C; Omernik JM; White D; Haggerty PK; Griffith GE
    J Environ Qual; 2003; 32(2):550-61. PubMed ID: 12708679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality.
    Tong ST; Chen W
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 66(4):377-93. PubMed ID: 12503494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting water quality impaired stream segments using landscape-scale data and a regional geostatistical model: a case study in Maryland.
    Peterson EE; Urquhart NS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):615-38. PubMed ID: 16967209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seasonal variations in the relationship between landscape pattern and land surface temperature in Indianapolis, USA.
    Liu H; Weng Q
    Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Sep; 144(1-3):199-219. PubMed ID: 17899413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating landscape ecology and geoinformatics to decipher landscape dynamics for regional planning.
    Dikou A; Papapanagiotou E; Troumbis A
    Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 48(3):523-38. PubMed ID: 21744152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of stream ecosystem function and sensitivity in the Bighorn National Forest, Wyoming.
    Wohl E; Cooper D; Poff L; Rahel F; Staley D; Winters D
    Environ Manage; 2007 Aug; 40(2):284-302. PubMed ID: 17557174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics.
    Gallant AL; Loveland TR; Sohl TL; Napton DE
    Environ Manage; 2004; 34 Suppl 1():S89-110. PubMed ID: 16044555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying ground water recharge at multiple scales using PRMS and GIS.
    Cherkauer DS
    Ground Water; 2004; 42(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 14763622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the hydrological landscape unit classification system and other terrain analysis measures for predicting low-flow nitrate and chloride in watersheds.
    Poor CJ; McDonnell JJ; Bolte J
    Environ Manage; 2008 Nov; 42(5):877-93. PubMed ID: 18626687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A spatially explicit framework for quantifying downstream hydrologic conditions.
    Strager MP; Petty JT; Strager JM; Barker-Fulton J
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19155121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relating landscape characteristics to non-point source pollution in mine waste-located watersheds using geospatial techniques.
    Xiao H; Ji W
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 16551489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correspondence of biological condition models of California streams at statewide and regional scales.
    May JT; Brown LR; Rehn AC; Waite IR; Ode PR; Mazor RD; Schiff KC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jan; 187(1):4086. PubMed ID: 25384371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Erosion risk analysis by GIS in environmental impact assessments: a case study--Seyhan Köprü Dam construction.
    Sahin S; Kurum E
    J Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 66(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 12448403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting hydrologic disturbance of streams using species occurrence data.
    Fox JT; Magoulick DD
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Oct; 686():254-263. PubMed ID: 31181513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts from above-ground activities in the eagle ford shale play on landscapes and hydrologic flows, La Salle County, Texas.
    Pierre JP; Abolt CJ; Young MH
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1262-75. PubMed ID: 25971735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.