529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16044604)
1. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment.
Gasner MR
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11():499-520. PubMed ID: 16047426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advance directives: an overview of changing right-to-die laws.
Fade AE
J Nurs Law; 1995; 2(3):27-38. PubMed ID: 12545976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
Stewart C
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
Martino M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. I have a conscience, too: the plight of medical personnel confronting the right to die.
Loftus IP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1990; 65(4):699-730. PubMed ID: 16044606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
Ouellette AR
Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Right to refuse life sustaining medical treatment and the noncompetent nonterminally ill patient: an analysis of abridgment and anarchy.
Adamson EH
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1990; 17(2):461-92. PubMed ID: 16047420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing attitudes in Florida's 'right to die' law.
Grimes GK
Stetson Law Rev; 1985; 14(2):375-95. PubMed ID: 16100801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
Dunlap JA
KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Euthanasia and the right to die: Nancy Cruzan and New Mexico.
Schwartz RL
N M Law Rev; 1990; 20(3):675-700. PubMed ID: 12186059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
