These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16044748)

  • 1. Changes in the soft tissue facial profile following orthodontic extractions: a geometric morphometric study.
    Singh GD; Maldonado L; Thind BS
    Funct Orthod; 2004 Winter-2005 Spring; 22(1):34-8, 40. PubMed ID: 16044748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Khan M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jul; 20(7):454-9. PubMed ID: 20642945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Kumari M; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Jan; 20(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 20141687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of changes during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment.
    Young TM; Smith RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):452-8. PubMed ID: 8480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group.
    Lin CH; Short LL; Banting DW
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22866592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of extraction treatment on Holdaway soft-tissue measurements.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15132442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of soft tissue profile changes in serial extraction and late premolar extraction.
    Wilson JR; Little RM; Joondeph DR; Doppel DM
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):165-73; discussion 173-4. PubMed ID: 10227558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Saelens NA; De Smit AA
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 9699401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial changes following treatment with a removable orthodontic appliance in adults.
    Singh GD; Diaz J; Busquets-Vaello C; Belfor TR
    Funct Orthod; 2004; 21(3):18-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 15641449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in Class III patients treated with fixed appliances and lower premolar extractions.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21696113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of first premolars extraction on vertical dimension in Italian patients with a Class I normo-divergent malocclusion. A retrospective study.
    Greco M; Fichera G; Barbato E; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 20545094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Boley JC; Pontier JP; Smith S; Fulbright M
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 9851352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical changes following first premolar extractions.
    Staggers JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jan; 105(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 8291489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.