125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16045274)
1. A hierarchical clustering approach for large compound libraries.
Böcker A; Derksen S; Schmidt E; Teckentrup A; Schneider G
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):807-15. PubMed ID: 16045274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NIPALSTREE: a new hierarchical clustering approach for large compound libraries and its application to virtual screening.
Böcker A; Schneider G; Teckentrup A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2220-9. PubMed ID: 17125166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cluster-based strategy for assessing the overlap between large chemical libraries and its application to a recent acquisition.
Engels MF; Gibbs AC; Jaeger EP; Verbinnen D; Lobanov VS; Agrafiotis DK
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2651-60. PubMed ID: 17125205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward an improved clustering of large data sets using maximum common substructures and topological fingerprints.
Böcker A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2097-107. PubMed ID: 18956832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the scaffold diversity of screening libraries.
Krier M; Bret G; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):512-24. PubMed ID: 16562979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of compound libraries based on natural product scaffolds and protein structure similarity clustering (PSSC).
Balamurugan R; Dekker FJ; Waldmann H
Mol Biosyst; 2005 May; 1(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 16880961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand-based virtual screening and in silico design of new antimalarial compounds using nonstochastic and stochastic total and atom-type quadratic maps.
Marrero-Ponce Y; Iyarreta-Veitía M; Montero-Torres A; Romero-Zaldivar C; Brandt CA; Avila PE; Kirchgatter K; Machado Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1082-100. PubMed ID: 16045304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mapping algorithms for molecular similarity analysis and ligand-based virtual screening: design of DynaMAD and comparison with MAD and DMC.
Eckert H; Vogt I; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1623-34. PubMed ID: 16859294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concept of combinatorial de novo design of drug-like molecules by particle swarm optimization.
Hartenfeller M; Proschak E; Schüller A; Schneider G
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jul; 72(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18564216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach.
Hessler G; Zimmermann M; Matter H; Evers A; Naumann T; Lengauer T; Rarey M
J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6575-84. PubMed ID: 16220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the predictive power of unsupervised visualization techniques to improve the identification of GPCR-focused compound libraries.
von Korff M; Hilpert K
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1580-7. PubMed ID: 16859289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A fast clustering algorithm for analyzing highly similar compounds of very large libraries.
Li W
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1919-23. PubMed ID: 16995722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A kinase-focused compound collection: compilation and screening strategy.
Sun D; Chuaqui C; Deng Z; Bowes S; Chin D; Singh J; Cullen P; Hankins G; Lee WC; Donnelly J; Friedman J; Josiah S
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 Jun; 67(6):385-94. PubMed ID: 16882313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning from the data: mining of large high-throughput screening databases.
Yan SF; King FJ; He Y; Caldwell JS; Zhou Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2381-95. PubMed ID: 17125181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure-based virtual ligand screening with LigandFit: pose prediction and enrichment of compound collections.
Montes M; Miteva MA; Villoutreix BO
Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(3):712-25. PubMed ID: 17510958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive combinatorial design of focused compound libraries.
Schneider G; Schüller A
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 572():135-47. PubMed ID: 20694689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The synergy between combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening.
Diller DJ
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 18428088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new algorithm for comparing and visualizing relationships between hierarchical and flat gene expression data clusterings.
Torrente A; Kapushesky M; Brazma A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(21):3993-9. PubMed ID: 16141251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scaffold hopping through virtual screening using 2D and 3D similarity descriptors: ranking, voting, and consensus scoring.
Zhang Q; Muegge I
J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(5):1536-48. PubMed ID: 16509572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
