BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16045803)

  • 1. Evaluation of normalization methods for cDNA microarray data by k-NN classification.
    Wu W; Xing EP; Myers C; Mian IS; Bissell MJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():191. PubMed ID: 16045803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hybrid BPSO-CGA approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data.
    Chuang LY; Yang CH; Li JC; Yang CH
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 21210743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and normalization of biases present in spotted cDNA microarray data: a composite method addressing dye, intensity-dependent, spatially-dependent, and print-order biases.
    Uchida S; Nishida Y; Satou K; Muta S; Tashiro K; Kuhara S
    DNA Res; 2005 Feb; 12(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16106748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using generalized procrustes analysis (GPA) for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Xiong H; Zhang D; Martyniuk CJ; Trudeau VL; Xia X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():25. PubMed ID: 18199333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation.
    Yang YH; Dudoit S; Luu P; Lin DM; Peng V; Ngai J; Speed TP
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2002 Feb; 30(4):e15. PubMed ID: 11842121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stratification bias in low signal microarray studies.
    Parker BJ; Günter S; Bedo J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():326. PubMed ID: 17764577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological study of affine transformations of gene expression data with proposed robust non-parametric multi-dimensional normalization method.
    Bengtsson H; Hössjer O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():100. PubMed ID: 16509971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Smyth GK; Speed T
    Methods; 2003 Dec; 31(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 14597310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments.
    Dobbin KK; Kawasaki ES; Petersen DW; Simon RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15774555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instance-based concept learning from multiclass DNA microarray data.
    Berrar D; Bradbury I; Dubitzky W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():73. PubMed ID: 16483361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments.
    Workman C; Jensen LJ; Jarmer H; Berka R; Gautier L; Nielser HB; Saxild HH; Nielsen C; Brunak S; Knudsen S
    Genome Biol; 2002 Aug; 3(9):research0048. PubMed ID: 12225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SED, a normalization free method for DNA microarray data analysis.
    Wang H; Huang H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():121. PubMed ID: 15345033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalization for two-channel microarray data.
    Ittrich C
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 16113767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust two-way semi-linear model for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Wang D; Huang J; Xie H; Manzella L; Soares MB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():14. PubMed ID: 15663789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model selection and efficiency testing for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Futschik M; Crompton T
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(8):R60. PubMed ID: 15287982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid feature selection method for DNA microarray data.
    Chuang LY; Yang CH; Wu KC; Yang CH
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Apr; 41(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 21376310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage normalization using background intensities in cDNA microarray data.
    Yoon D; Yi SG; Kim JH; Park T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 5():97. PubMed ID: 15268767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.