These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16046964)
1. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions. Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the quality of clinical procedures and technical standards of dental laboratories in fixed partial denture therapy. Albashaireh ZS; Alnegrish AS Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 10635191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation. Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations. Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique. Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial. Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen. Al-Odinee NM; Al-Hamzi M; Al-Shami IZ; Madfa A; Al-Kholani AI; Al-Olofi YM BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):304. PubMed ID: 33148226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients. Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials. Hayakawa I; Watanabe I Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 12731598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Considerations for services from dental technicians in fabrication of fixed prostheses: A survey of commercial dental laboratories in Thessaloniki, Greece. Hatzikyriakos A; Petridis HP; Tsiggos N; Sakelariou S J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 17098500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quality of fixed prosthodontic impressions: An assessment of crown and bridge impressions received at commercial laboratories. Rau CT; Olafsson VG; Delgado AJ; Ritter AV; Donovan TE J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Sep; 148(9):654-660. PubMed ID: 28601188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of materials supplied to dental laboratories for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in Ireland. Lynch CD; Allen PF Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Dec; 11(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 14737795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics. Drago CJ J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks. de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcome of the altered cast impression procedure compared with use of a one-piece cast. Frank RP; Brudvik JS; Noonan CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):468-76. PubMed ID: 15153855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]