These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16046964)

  • 21. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular impressions recorded with modeling plastic and a polyether impression material.
    Tan HK; Hooper PM; Baergen CG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 8957865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Impressions].
    Laverman JV
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1991 Oct; 98(10):403-7. PubMed ID: 1820536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Keys to Predictable Digital Impressions.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2022 Mar; 43(3):172-174. PubMed ID: 35272463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Full band impressions].
    Morel F; Gerlach A; Bois D
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990; 19(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 2218275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain.
    Radhi A; Lynch CD; Hannigan A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17244238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dual-arch impressions as a diagnostic aid--a case report.
    Mizrahi B
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jan; 51(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9461891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictable impression procedures for complete dentures.
    Felton DA; Cooper LF; Scurria MS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 40(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 8635625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Requirements of an impression material for fixed prostheses.
    Chu CS; Smales RJ; Wei SH
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(6):548-55; quiz 556-7. PubMed ID: 9663083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial.
    Luthardt RG; Walter MH; Weber A; Koch R; Rudolph H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 18717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics.
    Ciesco JN; Malone WF; Sandrik JL; Mazur B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jan; 45(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel technique to record crown and bridge impressions consistently.
    Goodchild JH; Conte NR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34 Spec No 6():9-13. PubMed ID: 24350913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention strength of impression materials to a tray material using different adhesive methods: an in vitro study.
    Marafie Y; Looney S; Nelson S; Chan D; Browning W; Rueggeberg F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 19033027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review.
    Carlsson GE; Ortorp A; Omar R
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23219617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.