BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16046970)

  • 1. Osseointegrated craniofacial implants in the rehabilitation of orbital defects: an update of a retrospective experience in the United States.
    Toljanic JA; Eckert SE; Roumanas E; Beumer J; Huryn JM; Zlotolow IM; Reisberg DJ; Habakuk SW; Wright RF; Rubenstein JE; Schneid TR; Mullasseril P; Garcia LT; Bedard JF; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 16046970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implant-retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA.
    Roumanas ED; Freymiller EG; Chang TL; Aghaloo T; Beumer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 12170845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraoral implants in the rehabilitation of craniofacial defects: implant and prosthesis survival rates and peri-implant soft tissue evaluation.
    Curi MM; Oliveira MF; Molina G; Cardoso CL; Oliveira Lde G; Branemark PI; Ribeiro Kde C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1551-7. PubMed ID: 22698291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of percutaneous implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects in irradiated cancer patients: a report of clinical outcomes and complications.
    Kosmidou L; Toljanic JA; Moran WJ; Panje WR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 9509790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study.
    Wright RF; Zemnick C; Wazen JJ; Asher E
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 18544137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of a newly designed single-stage craniofacial implant: a pilot study.
    Khamis MM; Medra A; Gauld J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 18992571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral rehabilitation after treatment for head and neck malignancy.
    Shaw RJ; Sutton AF; Cawood JI; Howell RA; Lowe D; Brown JS; Rogers SN; Vaughan ED
    Head Neck; 2005 Jun; 27(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15880417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival analysis and clinical evaluation of implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer resection patients over a mean follow-up period of 10 years.
    Nelson K; Heberer S; Glatzer C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 18021829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes.
    Teoh KH; Huryn JM; Patel S; Halpern J; Tunick S; Wong HB; Zlotolow IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 16274148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability measurements of craniofacial implants by means of resonance frequency analysis: 1-year clinical pilot study.
    Karakoca-Nemli S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Sarisoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 22299096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses.
    Chang TL; Garrett N; Roumanas E; Beumer J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 16126080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures.
    Granström G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 15883929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective study of implant-retained orbital prostheses: implant survival and patient satisfaction.
    Karakoca Nemli S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Sarisoy S; Kasko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1178-83. PubMed ID: 20613601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment outcome of extraoral implants in the craniofacial region.
    Karayazgan-Saracoglu B; Zulfikar H; Atay A; Gunay Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 20485041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Repair of orbital defects with implant-retained prostheses].
    Wang Y; Lin Y; Cui H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 19(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 15921323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.
    Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications.
    Aydin C; Karakoca S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 18548964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective study of osseointegrated skin-penetrating titanium fixtures used for retaining facial prostheses.
    Jacobsson M; Tjellstrom A; Fine L; Andersson H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 1299649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.