These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16046976)

  • 1. A trayless impression technique for complete arch implant-supported immediately loaded provisional and definitive restorations.
    Toth RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):202-3. PubMed ID: 16046976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A modified indirect working die technique for fabricating provisional restorations for multiple teeth.
    Antonelli JR; Gulker I
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):392-6. PubMed ID: 11203955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 23684284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics part 3: implant and external impressions.
    Massad JJ; Cagna DR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Oct; 28(10):554-60; quiz 561. PubMed ID: 18018390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A technique to transfer the contours of an interim implant restoration to the definitive cast.
    Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 25799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified indexing technique for the immediate interim restoration of a dental implant.
    Reis JM; Abi-Rached Fde O; Scardueli CR; Pinelli LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 24433838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):377-8. PubMed ID: 17098503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A spacer that facilitates construction of implant-supported prostheses frameworks.
    Huband ML; Hochstedler JL; Salinas TJ
    J Dent Technol; 1996; 13(6):8-12. PubMed ID: 9516261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A functional open-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdenture prostheses.
    Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 21651416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.