These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047419)

  • 1. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
    Schaefer K
    Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Prenatal adoption": the Vatican's proposal to the in vitro fertilization disposition dilemma.
    Puskar JM
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1998; 14(3):757-93. PubMed ID: 12568085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embryo donation: unresolved legal issues in the transfer of surplus cryopreserved embryos.
    Kindregan CP; McBrien M
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(1):169-206. PubMed ID: 16485374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
    King M
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conundrums with penumbras: the right to privacy encompasses non-gamete providers who create preembryos with the intent to become parents.
    Dillon LM
    Wash Law Rev; 2003 May; 78(2):625-51. PubMed ID: 15378817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
    Malo PE
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeking a better solution for the disposition of frozen embryos: is embryo adoption the answer?
    Redman PC; Redman LF
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):583-98. PubMed ID: 16273678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby contracts.
    Kwok CS
    Yale Law J; 2001 May; 110(7):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12741373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
    Rosado M
    New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
    Waldman EA
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.