These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047440)

  • 1. The role of contract principles in determining the validity of surrogacy contracts.
    Carbone JR
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1988; 28(3):581-610. PubMed ID: 16047440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Death without dignity for commercial surrogacy: the case of Baby M.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(2):21-4. PubMed ID: 3391765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who's your daddy (and mommy)? Creating certainty for Texas couples entering into surrogacy contracts.
    Holliday AM
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 2003; 34(4):1101-32. PubMed ID: 15568281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The limits of contract in family law: an analysis of surrogate motherhood.
    Carbone J
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():147-60. PubMed ID: 12708425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where do the children go?--surrogate mother contracts and the best interests of the child.
    Carney BJ
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1988; 22(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 15929235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whose child? In Re Baby M and the biological preference principle.
    Houlgate LD
    Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():161-77. PubMed ID: 12708426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. (Baby) M is for the many things: why I start with Baby M.
    Sanger C
    St Louis Univ Law J; 2000; 44(4):1443-64. PubMed ID: 12449927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surrogacy: the case for full contractual enforcement.
    Epstein RA
    Va Law Rev; 1995 Nov; 81(8):2305-41. PubMed ID: 16086503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A plea for the enforceability of gestational surrogacy contracts.
    Lascarides DE
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1221-59. PubMed ID: 16086520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Borne for another.
    Waller L
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 10(3):113-30. PubMed ID: 16041873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amicus brief: In the matter of Baby M.
    Taub N
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 16086457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of prebirth parentage orders in surrogacy proceedings.
    Snyder SH; Byrn MP
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):633-62. PubMed ID: 16610150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stopping the baby-trade: affirming the value of human life through the invalidation of surrogacy contracts: a blueprint for New Mexico.
    Combs JR
    N M Law Rev; 1999; 29(2):407-28. PubMed ID: 12778924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The power of pregnancy: examining constitutional rights in a gestational surrogacy contract.
    Ohs A
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 2002; 29(2):339-72. PubMed ID: 15174440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protectionism and freedom of contract: the erosion of female autonomy in surrogacy decisions.
    Munyon JH
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 2003; 36(3):717-44. PubMed ID: 15568233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surrogate contract: parentage -- Johnson v. Calvert.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 12159833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts.
    Havins WE; Dalessio JJ
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Status and contract in surrogate motherhood: an illumination of the surrogacy debate.
    Dolgin JL
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1990; 38(2):515-50. PubMed ID: 11650993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gestation: work for hire or the essence of motherhood? A comparative legal analysis.
    Laufer-Ukeles P
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():91-134. PubMed ID: 14986667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
    Gostin L
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):432-54. PubMed ID: 11475567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.