These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047440)
21. Surrogacy from the perspectives of economic and civil liberties. Gostin LO J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):429-31. PubMed ID: 11475566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Dead daddies: issues in postmortem reproduction. Dwyer LA Rutgers Law Rev; 2000; 52(3):881-910. PubMed ID: 12484405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Surrogacy: is there a case for legal prohibition? Goold I J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 15575322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. From Baby M. to Jaycee B.: fathers, mothers, and children in the brave new world. Hale JV J Contemp Law; 1998; 24(2):335-75. PubMed ID: 12465647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Uncovering the rationale for requiring infertility in surrogacy arrangements. Wilson RF Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(2-3):337-62. PubMed ID: 12961811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children? Kerian CL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Switched at the fertility clinic: determining maternal rights when a child is born from stolen or misdelivered genetic material. Noble-Allgire AM Miss Law Rev; 1999; 64(3):517-94. PubMed ID: 16523582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The egg donor and surrogacy controversy: legal issues surrounding representation of parties to an egg donor and surrogacy contract. Vorzimer AW Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):415-28. PubMed ID: 12199237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The law and surrogate parenting: is an agreement to bear a child for another enforceable?--With illustrative documents used to create the surrogacy arrangement which led to the "Baby M" case. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1987; No. 9():106-34. PubMed ID: 11650092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes. Kermani EJ; Weiss BA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 8605410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bargaining or biology? The history and future of paternity law and parental status. Baker KK Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2004; 14(1):1-69. PubMed ID: 15806730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Re Evelyn: surrogacy, custody and the Family Court. Stuhmcke A Aust J Fam Law; 1998 Dec; 12(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 17058333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. J.F. v. D.B. Pennsylvania. Erie County. Court of Common Pleas Pa Dist Cty Rep; 2004; 66():1-33. PubMed ID: 17225346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A summary of some recent developments on surrogacy in the United States. Arditti R Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 11650381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Surrogacy: ill-conceived rights. Willmott L J Law Med; 2002 Nov; 10(2):198-220. PubMed ID: 12497735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surrogacy in California. Hayes SG Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8864):180. PubMed ID: 8101280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Constitutionality of recognizing multiple parental rights in the surrogacy context. Kruse K Wis Womens Law J; 1992-1993; 7-8():67-84. PubMed ID: 16617537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]