These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047444)

  • 1. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights.
    Schehr AR
    Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equality of rights under the law: state constitutional protection for abortion rights in Maryland and beyond.
    Forman S
    Wis Womens Law J; 1991; 6():87-117. PubMed ID: 11656290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
    Hayhurst MB
    Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
    Callahan J
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's rights in Stalinist Hungary: the abortion trials of 1952-53.
    Peto A; Kossuth E
    Hung Stud Rev; 2002; 29(1-2):49-76. PubMed ID: 17233136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIPAA, Privacy, and Reproductive Rights in a Post-Roe Era.
    Shachar C
    JAMA; 2022 Aug; 328(5):417-418. PubMed ID: 35838680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender.
    Albiston C
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.