These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

976 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047452)

  • 61. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture?
    Callahan J
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995-1996 Winter; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change.
    Rubin ER
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.
    Stark B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. AIDS and adolescents.
    Hartman RG
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 15573442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Abortion as liberty and right.
    Hobin TJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
    Hammell H
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Defining minors' abortion rights.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1988; 13(5):321. PubMed ID: 3139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
    Guenther H
    Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Minor consent in birth control and abortion: Part 1.
    Trandel-Korenchuk D; Trandel-Korenchuk K
    Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(2):47, 50-1, 54. PubMed ID: 7360418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Gary-Northwest Indiana Women's Services v. Bowen. 25 Jan 1977.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 421():734-8. PubMed ID: 11646066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cultural feminism: it sounds good, but will it work? Application to a husband's interest in his wife's abortion decision.
    Brunner SD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1996; 22(1):101-23. PubMed ID: 16437821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Constitutional law--parental and judicial consent restrictions on a minor's decision to have an abortion.
    Vozella PF
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11665156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The constitutionality of court imposed contraception as a condition of probation.
    Mubaraki M
    Crim Justice J; 1992; 14(2):385-405. PubMed ID: 16700114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
    Belling DW; Eberl C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Minor's right to abortion: the status of minority is not a constitutionally permissable standard upon which the state may limit abortion by requiring parental consent.
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1975; 10(3):907-18. PubMed ID: 11664546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The abortion decision: a balancing of rights.
    Evans JC
    Christ Century; 1973 Feb; 90(7):195-7. PubMed ID: 11663384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Access to abortion pared at state level.
    Connolly C
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Roe and the new frontier.
    Roy LS
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 2003; 27(1):339-83. PubMed ID: 15568255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.