These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
939 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047452)
81. Legal rights of minors to sex-related medical care. Paul EW Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 11663598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
82. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
83. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
84. Abortion and the law in 1980. Paul EW; Schaap P NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
85. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative. Green W Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
86. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally. Foxworth JM William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
88. The competent child's preference in clinical medical decisions: a proposal for its consideration. Mark LB West State Univ Law Rev; 1983; 11(1):25-58. PubMed ID: 16086470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
89. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D; Nasser WP Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
90. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment. Destro RA Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
91. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument. Siegel RB Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
92. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy. Storrow RF; Martinez S Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
93. Judging girls: decision making in parental consent to abortion cases. Scarnecchia S; Field JK Mich J Gend Law; 1995; 3(41):75-123. PubMed ID: 11660504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
94. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies. Cherry AL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
95. Lesbians and abortion. Robson R Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
96. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women. Weitz TA; Fogel SB Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
97. Whither the family and family privacy? Jones TR; Peterman L Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
98. Abortion and human rights. Shaw D Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
100. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements. Rickless DM Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]