These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047454)

  • 21. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
    Robinson RM
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
    Thomas DL; Watson JM
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. First year of Maryland's new CRP statute in one state hospital.
    Storch DD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 8148510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right to refuse treatment: impact of Rivers v. Katz.
    Ciccone JR; Tokoli JF; Clements CD; Gift TE
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 2372578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can mental patients say no to drugs?
    Appelbaum PS
    N Y Times Mag; 1982 Mar; ():46, 51-52, 54+. PubMed ID: 11658304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stensvad v. Reivitz.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
    Fed Suppl; 1985 Jan; 601():128-32. PubMed ID: 11648509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What constitutes a psychiatric emergency: clinical and legal dimensions.
    Swartz MS
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 3427231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?
    Taylor-Dunn K
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1987-1988; 23(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 11659065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
    Williams KG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.
    Miller RD
    J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental patients' rights to refuse drugs: involuntary medication as cruel and unusual punishment.
    Symonds E
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1980; 7(3):701-38. PubMed ID: 11664186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Autonomy, self determination, the right of involuntarily committed persons to refuse treatment, and the use of substituted judgment in medication decisions involving incompetent persons.
    Hermann DH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 2286496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Should competence be coerced?
    Reamer FG; Kelly MJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):30; discussion 30-2. PubMed ID: 1976609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The right of a mental patient to refuse antipsychotic drugs in an institution.
    Gaughan LD; LaRue LH
    Law Psychol Rev; 1978; 4():43-85. PubMed ID: 11662727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constitutional law--Rennie v. Klein: constitutional right of privacy protects a mental patient's refusal of psychotropic medication.
    Craige B
    North Carol Law Rev; 1979 Oct; 57(1):1481-97. PubMed ID: 11658639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.