244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16047798)
1. Chromium-removal processes during groundwater remediation by a zerovalent iron permeable reactive barrier.
Wilkin RT; Su C; Ford RG; Paul CJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jun; 39(12):4599-605. PubMed ID: 16047798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 1. Hydrogeochemical studies.
Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Beak DG; Lee TR
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19167133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of a zerovalent iron reactive barrier for the treatment of arsenic in groundwater: Part 2. Geochemical modeling and solid phase studies.
Beak DG; Wilkin RT
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):15-28. PubMed ID: 19167132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinetics of soluble chromium removal from contaminated water by zerovalent iron media: corrosion inhibition and passive oxide effects.
Melitas N; Chuffe-Moscoso O; Farrell J
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Oct; 35(19):3948-53. PubMed ID: 11642457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Formation of ferrihydrite and associated iron corrosion products in permeable reactive barriers of zero-valent iron.
Furukawa Y; Kim JW; Watkins J; Wilkin RT
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(24):5469-75. PubMed ID: 12521177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term performance monitoring for a permeable reactive barrier at the U.S. Coast Guard Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina.
Puls RW; Blowes DW; Gillham RW
J Hazard Mater; 1999 Aug; 68(1-2):109-24. PubMed ID: 10518667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experimental study on the remediation of chromium contaminated groundwater with PRB media].
Zhu WH; Dong LF; Wang XR; Zhai YL
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jul; 34(7):2711-7. PubMed ID: 24028003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fifteen-year assessment of a permeable reactive barrier for treatment of chromate and trichloroethylene in groundwater.
Wilkin RT; Acree SD; Ross RR; Puls RW; Lee TR; Woods LL
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():186-94. PubMed ID: 24021639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Cr(VI) reduction efficiency of a permeable reactive barrier using Cr isotope measurements and 2D reactive transport modeling.
Wanner C; Zink S; Eggenberger U; Mäder U
J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Apr; 131(1-4):54-63. PubMed ID: 22343010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metal(loid)s removal by zeolite-supported iron particles from mine contaminated groundwater: Performance and mechanistic insights.
Wang P; Kong X; Ma L; Wang S; Zhang W; Song L; Li H; Wang Y; Han Z
Environ Pollut; 2022 Nov; 313():120155. PubMed ID: 36130632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater remediation with simulated permeable reactive barrier (PRB) filled with natural pyrite as reactive material: Environmental factors and effectiveness.
Liu Y; Mou H; Chen L; Mirza ZA; Liu L
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Nov; 298():83-90. PubMed ID: 26026959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-situ reactivation and reuse of micronsized sulfidated zero-valent iron using SRB-enriched culture: A sustainable PRB technology.
Yang Y; Zhan C; Li Y; Zeng J; Lin K; Sun J; Jiang F
Water Res; 2024 Apr; 253():121270. PubMed ID: 38359598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In situ remediation of Cr(VI) contaminated groundwater by ZVI-PRB and the corresponding indigenous microbial community responses: a field-scale study.
Wang Q; Song X; Wei C; Jin P; Chen X; Tang Z; Li K; Ding X; Fu H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150260. PubMed ID: 34537698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrochemical depassivation for recovering Fe(0) reactivity by Cr(VI) removal with a permeable reactive barrier system.
Lu X; Li M; Tang C; Feng C; Liu X
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Apr; 213-214():355-60. PubMed ID: 22386999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-objective optimization of permeable reactive barrier design for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater.
Maamoun I; Eljamal O; Falyouna O; Eljamal R; Sugihara Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Sep; 200():110773. PubMed ID: 32464445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of iron/aluminum bimetallic nanoparticle system for chromium-contaminated groundwater remediation.
Ou JH; Sheu YT; Tsang DCW; Sun YJ; Kao CM
Chemosphere; 2020 Oct; 256():127158. PubMed ID: 32470741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectroscopic investigation of Cr(III)- and Cr(VI)-treated nanoscale zerovalent iron.
Manning BA; Kiser JR; Kwon H; Kanel SR
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Jan; 41(2):586-92. PubMed ID: 17310726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the removal mechanism of Cr(VI) in groundwater using activated carbon and cast iron combined system.
Huang D; Wang G; Li Z; Kang F; Liu F
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(22):18341-18354. PubMed ID: 28639020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater by coupling electrokinetics with ZVI/Fe
Cao R; Liu S; Yang X; Wang C; Wang Y; Wang W; Pi Y
J Environ Sci (China); 2022 Feb; 112():280-290. PubMed ID: 34955212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier using reaction products as tracers.
Morrison S
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 May; 37(10):2302-9. PubMed ID: 12785541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
