These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1604837)
1. Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception. Kumar T; Glaser DA Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 1604837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant. Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eye movements facilitate stereo-slant discrimination when horizontal disparity is noisy. Berends EM; Zhang ZL; Schor CM J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):780-94. PubMed ID: 14765961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination of the spatial derivatives of horizontal binocular disparity. Lunn PD; Morgan MJ J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Feb; 14(2):360-71. PubMed ID: 9014355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Backus BT; Banks MS; van Ee R; Crowell JA Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(6):1143-70. PubMed ID: 10343832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Depth aftereffects mediated by vertical disparities: evidence for vertical disparity driven calibration of extraretinal signals during stereopsis. Duke PA; Oruç I; Qi H; Backus BT Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):228-41. PubMed ID: 16257031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. van Ee R; van Dam LC; Erkelens CJ J Vis; 2002; 2(9):597-607. PubMed ID: 12678631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex. Norcia AM; Gerhard HE; Meredith WJ J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(23):5608-5619. PubMed ID: 28473649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Depth magnitude from stereopsis: Assessment techniques and the role of experience. Hartle B; Wilcox LM Vision Res; 2016 Aug; 125():64-75. PubMed ID: 27369096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The stereoscopic sliver: a comparison of duration thresholds for fully stereoscopic and unmatched versions. Sachtler WL; Gillam B Perception; 2007; 36(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17357711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception. Allison RS; Howard IP Vision Res; 2000; 40(14):1869-85. PubMed ID: 10837832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity. Ito H Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. Hillis JM; Watt SJ; Landy MS; Banks MS J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):967-92. PubMed ID: 15669906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]