These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Ledgeway T Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2879-89. PubMed ID: 7975322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings. Shioiri S; Matsumiya K J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strong influence of test patterns on the perception of motion aftereffect and position. Fang F; He S J Vis; 2004 Aug; 4(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 15330707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation. Hine TJ; Cook M; Rogers GT Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(22):3093-102. PubMed ID: 8533345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Ashida H; Osaka N Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7660589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response. Keck MJ; Montague FW; Burke TP Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 7429771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test. Nishida S; Ashida H; Sato T Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2707-16. PubMed ID: 7975308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Müller R; Greenlee MW Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Motion of complex patterns is computed from the perceived motions of their components. Derrington A; Suero M Vision Res; 1991; 31(1):139-49. PubMed ID: 2006547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects. von Grünau M; Dubé S Spat Vis; 1992; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 1486063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial vision of the achromat: spatial frequency and orientation-specific adaptation. Greenlee MW; Magnussen S; Nordby K J Physiol; 1988 Jan; 395():661-78. PubMed ID: 3261791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms. Verstraten FA; Fredericksen RE; Van Wezel RJ; Lankheet MJ; Van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 8746231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference of spatial frequency selectivity between static and flicker motion aftereffects. Ashida H; Osaka N Perception; 1994; 23(11):1313-20. PubMed ID: 7761242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. Wright MJ Perception; 1986; 15(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 3588220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]