These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1604843)

  • 1. Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect.
    Cameron EL; Baker CL; Boulton JC
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):561-8. PubMed ID: 1604843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect.
    Bex PJ; Verstraten FA; Mareschal I
    Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(17):2721-7. PubMed ID: 8917759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect.
    Wright MJ; Johnston A
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(12):1947-55. PubMed ID: 3832620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli.
    Ledgeway T
    Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2879-89. PubMed ID: 7975322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings.
    Shioiri S; Matsumiya K
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strong influence of test patterns on the perception of motion aftereffect and position.
    Fang F; He S
    J Vis; 2004 Aug; 4(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 15330707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An illusion of relative motion dependent upon spatial frequency and orientation.
    Hine TJ; Cook M; Rogers GT
    Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(22):3093-102. PubMed ID: 8533345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity.
    Ashida H; Osaka N
    Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7660589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual motion aftereffects: critical adaptation and test conditions.
    Wade NJ; Spillmann L; Swanston MT
    Vision Res; 1996 Jul; 36(14):2167-75. PubMed ID: 8776483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual adaptation reveals asymmetric spatial frequency tuning for motion.
    Ledgeway T; Hutchinson CV
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):4.1-9. PubMed ID: 19271874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the spatial periodicity of moving gratings on motion response.
    Keck MJ; Montague FW; Burke TP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Nov; 19(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 7429771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test.
    Nishida S; Ashida H; Sato T
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2707-16. PubMed ID: 7975308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings.
    Müller R; Greenlee MW
    Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking lower and higher stages of motion processing?
    Mareschal I; Ashida H; Bex PJ; Nishida S; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 1997 Jul; 37(13):1755-9. PubMed ID: 9274762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion of complex patterns is computed from the perceived motions of their components.
    Derrington A; Suero M
    Vision Res; 1991; 31(1):139-49. PubMed ID: 2006547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects.
    von Grünau M; Dubé S
    Spat Vis; 1992; 6(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 1486063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial vision of the achromat: spatial frequency and orientation-specific adaptation.
    Greenlee MW; Magnussen S; Nordby K
    J Physiol; 1988 Jan; 395():661-78. PubMed ID: 3261791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms.
    Verstraten FA; Fredericksen RE; Van Wezel RJ; Lankheet MJ; Van de Grind WA
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 8746231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference of spatial frequency selectivity between static and flicker motion aftereffects.
    Ashida H; Osaka N
    Perception; 1994; 23(11):1313-20. PubMed ID: 7761242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision.
    Wright MJ
    Perception; 1986; 15(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 3588220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.