These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16048628)

  • 1. Effects of item and rater characteristics on checklist recording: what should we look for?
    Huber P; Baroffio A; Chamot E; Herrmann F; Nendaz MR; Vu NV
    Med Educ; 2005 Aug; 39(8):852-8. PubMed ID: 16048628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
    Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Chenot JF; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Koch A; Fischer T; Scherer M; Emmert B; Stanske B; Kochen MM; Himmel W
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 17973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
    Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
    Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method.
    Homer M; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Checklist agreement between standardized patients and faculty.
    Kopp KC; Johnson JA
    J Dent Educ; 1995 Aug; 59(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 7499599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does ultrasound training boost Year 1 medical student competence and confidence when learning abdominal examination?
    Butter J; Grant TH; Egan M; Kaye M; Wayne DB; Carrión-Carire V; McGaghie WC
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):843-8. PubMed ID: 17696983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model for integrated assessment of clinical competence.
    Panzarella KJ; Manyon AT
    J Allied Health; 2007; 36(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17941410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.
    Conigliaro RL; Stratton TD
    Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 20444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between standardized patient checklist item accuracy and performing arts experience.
    Langenau EE; Dyer C; Roberts WL; De Champlain AF; Montrey DP; Sandella JM
    Simul Healthc; 2011 Jun; 6(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 21646984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of medical training scenarios on heart rate variability and motivation in students and simulated patients.
    Rieber N; Betz L; Enck P; Muth E; Nikendei C; Schrauth M; Werner A; Kowalski A; Zipfel S
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):553-6. PubMed ID: 19493179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the head-to-toe physical examination skills of medical students.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing S; Klamen D; Valaski M; Eulenberg B; Popa M
    Med Teach; 2004 Aug; 26(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 15369880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: initial validity evidence.
    Yudkowsky R; Otaki J; Lowenstein T; Riddle J; Nishigori H; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):729-40. PubMed ID: 19659486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Humphrey-Murto S; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Smee S
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 19493175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Student performance problems in medical school clinical skills assessments.
    Hauer KE; Teherani A; Kerr KM; O'Sullivan PS; Irby DM
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 17895695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students.
    Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Lewis M; Coady D; Morley C; Kay L; Walker D; Hassell AB
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Jun; 57(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 17530689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.