These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16048788)

  • 1. The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.
    Thomas SC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1457-67. PubMed ID: 16048788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating variance components in natural populations using inferred relationships.
    Thomas SC; Pemberton JM; Hill WG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Apr; 84 ( Pt 4)():427-36. PubMed ID: 10849066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the wild.
    Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jul; 14(8):2593-9. PubMed ID: 15969737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations.
    Garant D; Kruuk LE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jun; 14(7):1843-59. PubMed ID: 15910310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general unified framework to assess the sampling variance of heritability estimates using pedigree or marker-based relationships.
    Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genetics; 2015 Jan; 199(1):223-32. PubMed ID: 25361897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.
    Da Y; Wang C; Wang S; Hu G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87666. PubMed ID: 24498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic scan as a tool for assessing the genetic component of phenotypic variance in wild populations.
    Herrera CM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():315-29. PubMed ID: 22665289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assortative mating biases marker-based heritability estimators.
    Border R; O'Rourke S; de Candia T; Goddard ME; Visscher PM; Yengo L; Jones M; Keller MC
    Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):660. PubMed ID: 35115518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations.
    Luo ZW; Tao SH; Zeng ZB
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):457-67. PubMed ID: 10978308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marker-based estimation of heritability in immortal populations.
    Kruijer W; Boer MP; Malosetti M; Flood PJ; Engel B; Kooke R; Keurentjes JJ; van Eeuwijk FA
    Genetics; 2015 Feb; 199(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 25527288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.
    Lynch M; Ritland K
    Genetics; 1999 Aug; 152(4):1753-66. PubMed ID: 10430599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data.
    Thomas SC; Hill WG
    Genetics; 2000 Aug; 155(4):1961-72. PubMed ID: 10924488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".
    Kruuk LE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Jun; 359(1446):873-90. PubMed ID: 15306404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood-based approach to estimating twin concordance for dichotomous traits.
    Witte JS; Carlin JB; Hopper JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 10096691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.
    Thompson R; Brotherstone S; White IM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1469-77. PubMed ID: 16048789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold and continuous phenotypes and molecular genetic data in simulated horse populations using Gibbs sampling.
    Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I
    BMC Genet; 2007 May; 8():19. PubMed ID: 17490471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On estimating the proportion of variance in a phenotypic trait attributable to a measured locus.
    Wijsman EM; Nur N
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 11173965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.