91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1604889)
1. Tube feeding in Wisconsin: medicine and law in conflict.
Kane RS
Wis Med J; 1992 May; 91(5):235-8. PubMed ID: 1604889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Shifting the burden of proof.
Davis DS
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):31-6. PubMed ID: 10123472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Terri Schiavo and the law.
Marks TC
Albany Law Rev; 2004; 67(3):843-7. PubMed ID: 15551518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal myths about terminating life support.
Meisel A
Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 1908215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Condemned to live. The dilemma posed by the case of Edna M.F.
Hisgen WJ
WMJ; 1998 Jan; 97(1):17. PubMed ID: 9448500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance directives and treatment withdrawal. Legal considerations.
Dewar MA
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 8133230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Talking to patients about end-of-life care.
Whisnant R
Minn Med; 2004 Jan; 87(1):8. PubMed ID: 14977261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A case for advance directives.
Heitz R
WMJ; 2007 Sep; 106(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 17970017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural death in 2003: are we slipping backwards?
Ashby M; Mendelson D
J Law Med; 2003 Feb; 10(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 12649994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
Elliott SJ
Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogate decision-making legislation: the next frontier in life-sustaining treatment policy.
Portman RM
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Oct; 24(10):311-9. PubMed ID: 10114557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Acceptance and validation of advanced directives--ethical and clinical considerations].
Sass HM; Kielstein R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):121-4. PubMed ID: 9214147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
Strong C
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruzan v Missouri: will the real meaning please stand up?
Barton HM
Tex Med; 1990 Nov; 86(11):18-9. PubMed ID: 2126896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The physician's role in completing advance directives: ensuring patients' capacity to make healthcare decisions in advance.
Wenger NS; Halpern J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 7749178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
Mazzeo KE
Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The best interests standard: a comparison of the state's parens patriae authority and judicial oversight in best interests determinations for children and incompetent patients.
Griffith DB
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):283-338. PubMed ID: 1765451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Elements of the Health Care Proxy Act.
Eisen JA
Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1993; 12(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 10126827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
