131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16049412)
1. [Estimation of X-radiation protective coats in abdominal angiography].
Koshida K; Sota T; Noto K; Fukuda A; Matsubara K; Nakagawa H; Kawabata C
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):989-96. PubMed ID: 16049412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics - Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass.
Schöpf T; Pichler T
Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):768-75. PubMed ID: 27248650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.
McCaffrey JP; Tessier F; Shen H
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4537-46. PubMed ID: 22830785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments.
Fog LS; Collins P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 19239057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
Welborn D; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shielding effectiveness of X-ray protective garment.
Eder H; Schlattl H
Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():343-350. PubMed ID: 33765649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inspection of lead aprons: a practical rejection model.
Stam W; Pillay M
Health Phys; 2008 Aug; 95 Suppl 2():S133-6. PubMed ID: 18617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The radiation protective devices for interventional procedures using computed tomography].
Iida H; Chabatake M; Shimizu M; Tamura S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 12527880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Gonad protective effect of radiation protective apron in chest radiography].
Hashimoto M; Kato H; Fujibuchi T; Ochi S; Morita F
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Dec; 60(12):1704-12. PubMed ID: 15614222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology.
Siiskonen T; Tapiovaara M; Kosunen A; Lehtinen M; Vartiainen E
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 80(954):460-8. PubMed ID: 17151067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation protection system for interventional procedures of the upper extremity: evaluation in a phantom model.
Haku T; Hosoya T; Ito H; Eguchi Y; Watanabe Y; Nishina M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Aug; 13(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 12171985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
