385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1604981)
1. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W
HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.
Puel JL; Rebillard G
J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
Lisowska G; Smurzynski J; Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Probst R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of aging on medial olivocochlear system function.
Lisowska G; Namyslowski G; Orecka B; Misiolek M
Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():901-14. PubMed ID: 24959071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.
Lichtenhan JT; Wilson US; Hancock KE; Guinan JJ
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():216-224. PubMed ID: 26364824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
