These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16051308)

  • 1. The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields.
    Levine MW; McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2820-30. PubMed ID: 16051308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor encoding of position by contrast-defined motion.
    Allen HA; Ledgeway T; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):1985-99. PubMed ID: 15149832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subthreshold features of visual objects: unseen but not unbound.
    Melcher D; Vidnyánszky Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1863-7. PubMed ID: 16414096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual field asymmetries in selective attention: evidence from a modified search paradigm.
    Michael GA; Ojéda N
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Nov; 388(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 16026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm.
    Desjardins S; Braun CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 16137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The detection of motion in chromatic stimuli: first-order and second-order spatial structure.
    Cropper SJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):865-80. PubMed ID: 15644227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different attentional resources modulate the gain mechanisms for color and luminance contrast.
    Morrone MC; Denti V; Spinelli D
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1389-401. PubMed ID: 15066398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anisotropies in the perceived spatial displacement of motion-defined contours: opposite biases in the upper-left and lower-right visual quadrants.
    Fan Z; Harris J
    Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2101-9. PubMed ID: 20673777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone opponency in the near peripheral retina.
    Murray IJ; Parry NR; McKeefry DJ
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16961987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of background color on detecting spot stimuli in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Maehara G; Okubo M; Michimata C
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):558-63. PubMed ID: 15223202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli.
    Lupien S; Lafrance MS; Lecours AR
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathway contributions to visual field anisotropies.
    McAnany JJ; Levine MW
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2327-36. PubMed ID: 17662333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction of visual hemifield and body view in biological motion perception.
    de Lussanet MH; Fadiga L; Michels L; Seitz RJ; Kleiser R; Lappe M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 27(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 18215244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields.
    Alvarez GA; Cavanagh P
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):637-43. PubMed ID: 16102067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.